Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data in The Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

Siti Isnaine Haini, Nor Zairah Ab. Rahim, Norziha Megat Mohd. Zainuddin, Roslina Ibrahim


Open Government Data (OGD) adoption has been extensively studied; however, few have examined the success factors of OGD adoption in the public sector context. The benefits of leveraging data in enhancing public service delivery have been a significant concern to the top management of the public sector in providing them insight for strategic planning together with timely decision making. The aim of this paper is to review recent literature from the year 2010 to 2018 on OGD adoption at the organizational level in the public sector context. We systematically searched all English papers that were indexed in seven electronic journal databases (Scopus, Emerald, Web of Science, Science Direct, ACM, Springer and IEEE) which include journals, proceedings, books and book chapters. Few papers were acquired from snowballing techniques and ResearchGate webpage. A total of 886 publications were identified in this process and 25 papers have finally been selected which are deemed as relevant papers for the analysis stage. As derived from 25 selected papers, this study has identified 16 factors that influence the OGD adoption which has been categorized into three main dimensions: Technological, Organizational and Environmental (T-O-E). Policy, technological competence, top management support and organization culture are among the most influential factors of OGD adoption. Therefore, this study is expected to assist other researchers to understand the current stage of OGD adoption in terms of influential factors, research domains and research methodology.


Open Data; Open Government Data; adoption; public sector; factors.

Full Text:



M. A. Hossain, Y. K. Dwivedi, and N. P. Rana, “State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda,” J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer., vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 14–40, 2016.

P. Conradie and S. Choenni, “On the barriers for local government releasing open data,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. SUPPL.1, pp. 1–8, 2014.

M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, SI, pp. 258–268, 2012.

B. Ubaldi, “Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives,” OECD, no. 22, 2013.

J. Kucera and D. Chlapek, “Benefits and Risks of Open Government Data,” J. Syst. Integr., pp. 30–41, 2014.

MAMPU, “Portal Data Terbuka Sektor Awam Malaysia,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.data.gov.my/. [Accessed: 15-Aug-2018].

A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, “Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2014.

S. Saxena and M. Janssen, “Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through UTAUT framework,” FORESIGHT, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 421–436, 2017.

H. Almuftah, V. Weerakkody, and U. Sivarajah, “Comparing and Contrasting e-Government Maturity Models: A Qualitative-Meta Synthesis,” vol. 0, 2016.

H.-J. Wang and J. Lo, “Adoption of open government data among government agencies,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 80–88, Jan. 2016.

M. A. Hossain and C. Chan, “Open data adoption in Australian government agencies: an exploratory study,” in Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2015, 2015.

S. Stuti, “Asymmetric Open Government Data (OGD) framework in India,” Digit. Policy, Regul. Governance, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 434–448, 2018.

L. P. Ba and D. Constantin, “Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City,” pp. 195–208, 2017.

L. Schmidthuber, D. Hilgers, T. Gegenhuber, and S. Etzelstorfer, “The emergence of local open government: Determinants of citizen participation in online service reporting,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 457–469, 2017.

U. Sivarajah et al., “The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government,” J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer., vol. 26, no. 1–2, SI, pp. 64–79, Apr. 2016.

B. W. Wirtz, J. C. Weyerer, and M. Rosch, “Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–13, 2017.

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 429–440, Oct. 2015.

G. Smith, H. A. Ofe, and J. Sandberg, “Digital service innovation from open data: exploring the value proposition of an open data marketplace,” in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016, vol. 2016-March, pp. 1277–1286.

V. Weerakkody, Z. Irani, K. Kapoor, U. Sivarajah, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 285–300, Apr. 2017.

M. M. Khurshid, N. H. Zakaria, A. Rashid, and M. N. Shafique, “Examining the Factors of Open Government Data Usability from Academician’s Perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 72–85, 2018.

M. Kaasenbrood, A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, M. de Jong, and N. Bharosa, “Exploring the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data by Private Organisations,” Int. J. Public Adm. Digit. Age, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–92, 2015.

T. M. Yang, J. Lo, and J. Shiang, “To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data,” J. Inf. Sci., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 596–612, 2015.

T.-M. Yang and Y.-J. Wu, “Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies’ open data publication: A study in Taiwan,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 378–392, Jul. 2016.

A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, “Towards decision support for disclosing data : Closed or open data ?,” Inf. Polity, vol. 20, pp. 103–117, 2015.

F. Haneem and N. Kama, “Recent progress of factors influencing information technology adoption in local government context,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 96, no. 16, pp. 5510–5521, 2018.

C. Okoli and K. Schabram, “A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research,” 2010.

B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering,” 2007.

I. Safarov, “Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–24, 2018.

S. Aarshi, B. H. Malik, F. Habib, K. Ashfaq, I. Saleem, and U. Tariq, “Dimensions of open government data web portals: A case of Asian countries,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 459–469, 2018.

M. S. Altayar, “Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 633–643, 2018.

G. A. Parung, A. N. Hidayanto, P. I. Sandhyaduhita, K. L. M. Ulo, and K. Phusavat, “Barriers and strategies of open government data adoption using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 12, no. 3/4, pp. 210–243, 2018.

M. Beno, K. Figl, J. Umbrich, and A. Polleres, “Open data hopes and fears: Determining the barriers of open data,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017, 2017, pp. 69–81.

A. Mishra, D. P. Misra, A. K. Kar, S. Babbar, and S. Biswas, “Digital Nations – Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability,” in IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017, 2017, vol. 10595, no. January, pp. 159–171.

A. Ingrams, “The legal-normative conditions of police transparency: A configurational approach to open data adoption using qualitative comparative analysis,” PUBLIC Adm., vol. 95, no. 2, SI, pp. 1–19, Jun. 2017.

A. T. Chatfield and C. G. Reddick, “A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 231–243, 2017.

B. Fan and Y. Zhao, “The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data,” Gov. Inf. Q., no. July, pp. 0–1, 2017.

P. Colpaert et al., “Open transport data for maximising reuse in multimodal route planners: a study in Flanders,” IET Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 397–402, 2017.

A. Takeoka and C. G. Reddick, “The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation di ff union: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2017.

S. Saxena, “Significance of open government data in the GCC countries,” Digit. POLICY Regul. Gov., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 251–263, 2017.

E. W. Welch, M. K. Feeney, and C. H. Park, “Determinants of data sharing in US city governments,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 393–403, Jul. 2016.

J. Shkabatur and A. Peled, “Sustaining the open government data movement worldwide: Insights from developing countries,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, 2016, pp. 172–179.

I. Susha, A. Zuiderwijk, Y. Charalabidis, P. Parycek, and M. Janssen, “Critical factors for open data publication and use: A comparison of city-level, regional, and transnational cases,” J. eDemocracy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94–115, 2015.

A. Whitmore, “Using open government data to predict war: A case study of data and systems challenges,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. 4, SI, pp. 622–630, Oct. 2014.

C. S. Albano and N. Reinhard, “Open government data: Facilitating and motivating factors for coping with potential barriers in the Brazilian context,” in 13th International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), 2014, vol. 8653 LNCS, pp. 181–193.

D. S. Sayogo and T. a Pardo, “Understanding Smart Data Disclosure Policy Success: The Case of Green Button,” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2013, pp. 72–81.

A. Veenstra and T. Broek, “Opening Moves – Drivers, Enablers and Barriers of Open Data in a Semi-public Organization,” in 12th International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), 2013, pp. 50–61.

S. Ganapati and C. G. Reddick, “Open e-government in US state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 115–122, Apr. 2012.

Tornatzky, L. G., M. Fleischer, and A. K. Chakrabarti, Processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books, 1990.

C. Adrian and Y. Y. J. Rusli Abdullah, Rodziah Atan, “Factors Influencing to the Implementation Success of Big Data Analytics: A Systematic Literature Review,” 2017.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.9488


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development