Sorting Algorithm Applied in Geographical Regions Using Residential Electricity Consumption Indicators

L.M. Alonso Águila, Julio Barzola-Monteses, Yomar González-Cañizalez, José Hidalgo-Crespo, Silvia Coello-Pisco

Abstract


The electricity consumption per capita in Ecuador almost doubled between 1999 and 2017. Although electricity, gas and fuels are subsidized by the state, and thus generate savings for users, this often leads to inefficient use or bad energy consumption habits in the population. The current economic situation in the country has urged reconsidering the continuity of fuel subsidies, so prices have been adjusted. It is evident that the continued elimination of subsidies will negatively impact Ecuadorian low and middle-income families, becoming necessary to find alternatives and possible solutions regarding energy, while also familiarizing with the profile and habits of electricity consumption in residences. A sorting algorithm based on Theory of Decision in Uncertainty is implemented to rank 8 urban-marginal areas in Guayaquil City according to 14 indicators that significantly impact energy consumption. From 700 thousand users of urban-marginal areas of Ecuador, 200 thousand can be found in Guayaquil. The information of some indicators of electrical consumption collected in surveys applied in residences of the areas is used as an ordering criterion. Results will show the differences between those areas and will be useful for later studies or for decision-making processes of competent authorities in order to improve living conditions while maintaining rational indicators of electrical consumption. Los Esteros, Guasmo and Vergeles present the best consumption pattern, in comparison with Bastión Popular and Flor de Bastión, which show the worst results in regards to the consumption among the 8 areas studied.

Keywords


electricity consumption indicators; energy consumption; energy demand; ordering algorithm; theory of decision.

Full Text:

PDF

References


INEC, “Ecuador en cifras,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/guayaquil-en-cifras/.

ARCONEL, “Estadística del Sector Eléctrico,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.regulacionelectrica.gob.ec/estadistica-del-sector-electrico/.

V. Orejuela, D. Arias, and A. Aguila, “Response of Residential Electricity Demand Against Price Signals in Ecuador,” in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Thirty Fifth Central American and Panama Convention (Concapan XXXV), 2015, pp. 1–6.

F. Schaffitzel, M. Jakob, R. Soria, A. Vogt-Schilb, and H. Ward, “Can government transfers make energy subsidy reform socially acceptable? A case study on Ecuador,” Energy Policy, vol. In Press, 2019.

G. Poveda Burgos, M. Suraty Molestina, and R. Mackay Castron, “Trade policy in the framework of the ecuadorian international trade [Políticas comerciales en el marco del comercio internacional ecuatoriano],” Espacios, vol. 39, no. 47, 2018.

S. Coello Pisco, Y. Gónzalez Cañizares, J. Hidalgo Crespo, J. Barzola Monteses, and L. M. Alonso Águila, “Desarrollo de habilidades Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, en estudiantes universitarios de Física mediante proyectos I +D + i. Caso: estimación de la demanda de la energía eléctrica en zonas rurales y urbano-marginales,” Rev. Mex. Física E, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2019.

M. Mite-León and J. Barzola-Monteses, “Statistical Model for the Forecast of Hydropower Production in Ecuador,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1130–1137, 2018.

J. Barzola-Monteses, M. Mite-León, M. Espinoza-Andaluz, J. Gómez-Romero, and W. Fajardo, “Time Series Analysis for Predicting Hydroelectric Power Production: The Ecuador Case,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 6539, pp. 1–19, 2019.

J. Barzola, F. Cabrera, and M. Espinoza, “On Parameters Testing of an Innovative Mortar Made of Rice Husk to be Used for Housing Walls,” in ISES Solar World Congress 2015, 2015, no. November 2015, pp. 1–7.

J. Barzola and L. Rubini, “A Hypothetical Migration Analysis of the PLC based on IEEE 1901.2 Standard,” in Proceedings of the 21st World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2017), 2017, pp. 86–91.

J. Hidalgo, S. Coello, and Y. González, “The Determinants of Household Electricity Demand in Marginal Ecuador: ‘A Case Study at Monte Sinai ,’” in 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Innovation in Education and Inclusion,” 2018, pp. 1–6.

H. Wallis, M. Nachreiner, and E. Matthies, “Adolescents and electricity consumption; Investigating sociodemographic, economic, and behavioural in fl uences on electricity consumption in households,” Energy Policy, vol. 94, pp. 224–234, 2016.

A. A. Aliaga-Benavides, Y. Santana-Pacheco, A. Mustelier-Hechavarría, and Y. Guzmán-Bazán, “Computer algorithm for comparing and ordering models based on indicators and user value,” Rev. Fac. Ing., vol. 26, no. 46, pp. 61–69, 2017.

T. Nishijima, A. Honda, and M. Ohki, “Proposal of an efficient rank-ordering method based on subjectivity,” Communiation Pap. 2017 Fed. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, pp. 353–356, 2017.

J. Gil Aluja, Elementos para una teoría de la decisión en la incertidumbre. España: Editorial Milladoiro, 1999.

J. Hidalgo-Crespo, Y. González Cañizalez, S. Coello Pisco, J. Barzola-Monteses, L. M. Alonso Aguila, and T. Crespo-Vaca, “Household Electricity Demand in Marginal Ecuador: Estimation and impact of explanatory variables,” Rev. Ibérica Sist. e Tecnol. Informação, 2019.

Y. González Cañizalez, J. Hidalgo-Crespo, S. Coello Pisco, J. Barzola-Monteses, and L. M. Alonso Águila, “Sorting urban-marginal areas in Ecuador by weighting energy consumption indicators,” Rev. Iber. Sist. e Tecnol. Inf., 2019.

C. Grottera et al., “Linking electricity consumption of home appliances and standard of living: A comparison between Brazilian and French households,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 94, pp. 877–888, 2018.

L. Maluf de Lima and M. R. Piedade Bacchi, “Assessing the impact of Brazilian economic growth on demand for electricity,” Energy, vol. 172, pp. 861–873, 2019.

J. Gil-Aluja, “Entre la epistemología y la lógica. Decisión y algoritmo de ordenación,” Cuad. Gestión, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 2001.

A. Kaufmann and J. Gil Aluja, Grafos neuronales para la economía y la gestión de empresas. España: Editorial Pirámide, 1995.

J. Gil Lafuente, Marketing para el nuevo milenio: nuevas técnicas para la gestión comercial en la incertidumbre Descripción principal. España: Ediciones Pirámide, 1997.

L. M. Alonso Águila, “La evaluación del aprendizaje desde una perspectiva de la subjetividad y la incertidumbre. Una propuesta de modelo de autoevaluación a partir de competencias,” Rev. Iberoam. Educ., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2006.

E. R. Veitia Rodríguez, Y. Martínez-López, and A. Montalbán Estrada, “Aplicación de la lógica difusa en la toma de decisiones para la sostenibilidad del suelo,” Rev. Ciencias Técnicas Agropecu., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 31–36, 2014.

A. C. Durán C. and R. C. Piedra, “Percepción de estudiantes y docentes sobre el curso de nivelación en matemáticas del ISFODOSU: una aplicación de la matemática difusa,” Rev. del Salomé, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–103, 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.10805

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development