Response Surface Methodology Approach to the Optimization of Cyclone Separator Geometry for Maximum Collection Efficiency

Y Yunardi, Umi Fathanah, Edi Munawar, Bayu Pramana Putra, Asbar Razali, Novi Sylvia


A Response surface methodology coupled with a Box-Behnken design experiment has been utilized to optimize geometry parameters of a cyclone as a gas-solid separator in an effort to obtain a maximum particle collection efficiency. Independent variables being optimized include seven geometry parameters of inlet height (a/D), inlet width (b/D), vortex finder height (S/D), vortex finder diameter (De/D), total cyclone height (Ht/D), cylinder height (h/D), and cone tip diameter (Bc/D). A number of 62 treatments were performed following Box-Behnken experimental design of seven factors and three levels (-1, 0 and +1). The response variable, the cyclone collection efficiency, was calculated in accordance with the Muschelknautz model using a spreadsheet software. The relationship between the response variable and independent variables was mathematically expressed according to a quadratic polynomial equation calculated with the aid of Design Expert software.  The results of the research showed that among seven variables being investigated, there are only five cyclone geometry parameters which significantly affected the cyclone collection efficiency, including inlet height (a/D), inlet width (b/D), vortex finder height (S/D), vortex finder diameter (De/D) and total cyclone height (Ht/D).  The optimization was then conducted to include these five variables that significantly affected the collection efficiency and neglected the remaining other two variables.  The optimization computation was run in the Design Expert statistical software by setting a maximum possible value for the collection efficiency. The maximum collection efficiency of 91.244% was obtained when the independent variables of inlet height a/D=0.8, inlet width b/D=0.38, vortex finder height S/D=0.69, vortex finder diameter De/D=0.575 and total cyclone height Ht/D=3.12.  Validation of this statistical finding was tested again and compared with the result of Muschelknautz model calculation to give a significantly small error of 0.82%.


box-behnken; design experiment; particle; muschelknautz model; RSM; factor; calculation.

Full Text:



Swamee P.K, Aggarwal N, Bhobhiya K. “Optimum Design of Cyclone Separator”, AIChE., vol. 55, pp.2279–2283, 2009.

Altmeyer, S., Mathieu, V. Jullemier, S. Contal, P. Midoux, N., S. Rode, S., Leclerc J.-P., “Comparison of different models of cyclone prediction performance for various operating conditions using a general software”, Chem. Eng. Process, vol. 43, pp. 511–522, 2004.

Shepherd C. B, Lapple C.E., “Flow Pattern and Pressure Drop in Cyclone Dust Collectors”. Ind. & Eng. Chem., vol. 32, pp. 1246-1248, 1940.

Barth W., “Design and Layout of the Cyclone Separator on the Basis of New Investigations”. Brenn. Warme Kraft, vol. 8, pp. 1-9, 1956.

Stairmand C. J. “The Design and Performance of Cyclone Separators”. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., vol. 29, pp. 357-383, 1951.

Mohamed-Swaray, S.G, Hamdullapur, F., “A new semi-empirical model for predicting particulate collection efficiency in low-to-high temperature gas cyclone separators” Advanced Powder Technol., vol.15 (2), pp. 137– 164, 2004,

Hoffmann A.C, Stein L.E., Gas Cyclones and Swirl Tubes Principle, Design and Operation. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp 111-137, 2008.

Muschelknautz, E and Krambrock, W., “Design of cyclone separators in the engineering practice”, Staub-Reinhalt. Luft, vol. 30, pp. 1-12, 1970.

Deng. Q.-F. Zhang, -L., “Application of Muschelknautz models in design of cyclone”, Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), vol. 42(4), pp. 977-983, 2011.

Elsayed K, Lacor C., “Optimization of the Cyclone Separator Geometry for Minimum Pressure Drop Using Mathematical Models and CFD Simulations”. Chem. Eng. Sci. vol. 65 (22), pp. 6048-6058, 2010.

Brar, L. S., “Application of response surface methodology to optimize the performance of cyclone separator using mathematical models and CFD simulations” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 5, pp. 20426–20436, 2018.

Tang D.S, Tian Y.J, He Y.Z, Li L, Hu S.Q, Li B., “Optimisation of Ultrasonic-assisted Protein Extraction from Brewer’s Spent Grain”. Czech J. Food Sci., vol. 28, pp. 9-17, 2010.

Yunardi, Zulkifli, Masrianto. “Response Surface Methodology Approach to Optimizing Process Variables for The Densification of Rice Straw as a Rural Alternative Solid Fuel”, J. Appl Sci, vol. 11, pp. 1192-1198, 2011.

Rong-shan, B., Zhen-xing, W., Yu-gang, L., Xin-shun, T., Shi-qing, Z., Zhen-dong, L, Wen-wu, C., “Study on a New type of Gas-Liquid Cyclone used in COIL”, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering, 15-19 July 2012, Singapore, pp. 565-569, 2012.

Lazic, Z.R., Design of Experiment in Chemical Engineering: A Practical Guide. New York: Wiley-VCH, 2004.

Derirnger, G and Suich, R., “Simultaneous optimization of several response variables, J. Qual. Technol., vol. 12, pp. 214-219, 1980.

Koocheki A, Mortazavi S.A, Shahidi F, Razavi S.M.A, Kadkhodaee R, Milani J.M., “Optimization of Mucilage Extraction from Qodume Shirazi Seed (Alyssum Homolocarpum) Using Response Surface Methodology”. J. Food Proc. Eng., vol. 33, pp. 861-882, 2010.

Bootan, S., Qader, E.E, Supeni, M.K., Ariffin A.R., Abu Talib, “RSM approach for modeling and optimization of designing parameters for inclined fins of solar air heater”, Renewable Energy vol. 136, pp. 48-68, 2019.

Baligidad, S.M., Chandrasekar, U., Elangovan, K, Snahkar, S. “RSM Optimization of Parameters influencing Mechanical properties in Selective Inhibition Sintering” Materials Today, vol. 5 (2), 4903–4910, 2018.

Faulkner, B., Shaw, B.W., “Efficiency and Pressure Drop of Cyclones across a Range of Inlet Velocities”, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 22(1), pp. 155-161, 2006.

Funk, P.A., Elsayed, K., Yeater, K.M., Holt, G.A., Whitelock, D.P., “Could cyclone performance improve with reduced inlet velocity?”, Powder Technology, vol. 280, pp. 211–218, 2015.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development