Integrating AHP, Cluster Analysis, and Fuzzy TOPSIS to Evaluate Emergency Warehouse Locations of Mount Merapi Eruption Victims

Diana Puspita Sari, Purnawan Adi Wicaksono, Naniek Utami Handayani, Yessica Efirani Siahaan

Abstract


This paper discusses using a multi-criteria decision model (MCDM) to determine a logistics warehouse location for humanitarian aid. This study concerns the volcanic disaster that occurred in Sleman Regency, Indonesia, in 2010. When this disaster occurred, the location for the logistics warehouse was still based on the closest distance with road access. Since it was located without considering several criteria, delivery to victims was not optimal and faced many obstacles. In this study, MCDM is applied using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy TOPSIS (a technique for the order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution); AHP is used to generate selection criteria and sub-criteria based on expert opinion, while Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to identify the best option among potential locations based on these criteria and subcriteria. This study also uses cluster analysis to determine potential emergency warehouse locations in each operational area based on distance and the number of refugees. Seven criteria and 17 subcriteria were identified to determine the location of the emergency warehouse. In this case, the criteria and subcriteria with the highest weights were both delivery time. Based on the weight of the criteria and subcriteria and the cluster analysis, four potential warehouse locations were identified in the following priority order: Sukoharjo, Sidokerto, Tamanmartani, and Wedomartani.

Keywords


logistics warehouse; volcanic disaster; cluster analysis; MCDM.

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Trirahayu, “Manajemen bencana erupsi gunung merapi oleh badan penanggulangan bencana daerah kabupaten slemanâ€. Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1-14, 2015.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2010). [Online]: https://geospasial.bnpb.go.id/2010/11/30/peta-rekapitulasi perkabupaten-jumlah-korban pengungsi-dan-kerusakan akibat-letusan-gunung merapi-30-nov-20101/. [Acessed 16 December 2017].

A.S. Thomas, and L. R. Kopczak, “From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sectorâ€. Fritz Institute, Vol.15, pp. 1-15, 2005.

S. Pettit, and A. Beresford, “Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chainsâ€, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.39, No.6, pp. 450-468, 2009.

Council of Logistics Management., “Logistics Excellence: Vision, Processes, and Peopleâ€, Council of Logistics Management 1998 Annual Conference, pp. 11-14, 1998.

B. M. Beamon, and B. Balcik, “Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chainsâ€, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 4-25, 2008.

C. G., Rawls and M. A. Turnquist, “Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 44, pp. 616-628, 2010.

S. Y. Chou, H. Yoon, and C. Y. Shen, “a fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes ‘. European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 132-145, 2008.

C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, and Z. Ulukan, “Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHPâ€. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16, No.6, pp. 382-394, 2003.

BPBD Sleman, https://bpbd.slemankab.go.id. [Acessed 15 June 2020].

S. Percin, “Fuzzy multiâ€criteria riskâ€benefit analysis of business process outsourcing (BPO)â€. Information Management & Computer Security, Vol.16, No.3, pp. 213-234, 2008.

T. Chu, “Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisionsâ€, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol .10, No.6, pp. 687-701, 2002.

P. Degener, “Decision support for the location planning in disaster areas using multi-criteria methodsâ€, Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference – Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013.

H. Magdalena, “Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan mahasiswa lulusan terbaik di perguruan tinggi (studi kasus STMIK Atma Luhur Pangkalpinang)â€, Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, pp. 49-56, 2012.

Z. Khakim, H. Hasyim, and R. Anwar, “Studi pemilihan pengerjaan beton antara pracetak dan konvensional pada pelaksanaan konstruksi gedung dengan metode AHPâ€, Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 95-107, 2011.

Na'am, “Sebuah tinjauan penggunaan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam sistem penunjang keputusan pada jurnal berbahasa Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal MEDIASISFO, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 888-895, 2017.

D. De La Fuente, “Determining warehouse number and location in spain by cluster analysisâ€, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.68-79, 1998.

S. R. Wurdianarto, S. Novianto, and U. Rosyidah, “Perbandingan euclidean distance dengan Canberra distance pada face recognitionâ€, Jurnal Teknologi, Vol13, No.1, pp.31-37, 2014.

A. Sabiq, “Metode fuzzy AHP dan fuzzy TOPSIS untuk pemilihan Distro Linuxâ€. Orbith, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 78-83, 2013.

B. Sodhi, and T. V. Prabhakar, A Simplified Description of Fuzzy TOPSISâ€. Kanpur: Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.6923

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development