Location Analysis for Additional Permanent Radiation Detector in X-Ray Radiography Unit

Rizka Indra Prasetya, Gede Bayu Suparta

Abstract


We have developed a Digital Fluorescence X-Ray Radiography prototype at the Department of Physics, Gadjah Mada University (UGM). The prototype should comply with radiation protection rules. Using an additional permanent dose detector to measure dose radiation indirectly is necessary. We indirectly controlled the dose analysis through a dose control chart from a permanent detector. We consider the Heel Effect in determining the position of the detector at the edge of the screen while reducing the scattered radiation and minimizing the difference to the reference point. The position of the detector follows a grid 5x5. The dose measurement will show the dose distribution pattern. It shows that the radiation dose at the edge point close to the cathode side has the closest dose value to the center point. The dose value variation at 70 kVp and 80 kVp is less than 5%. The dose value equation for the prototype is Gy = [(0.3579* kVp) -16.27] * mAs. A control chart will control that equation from the permanent detector to ensure that the dose value obtained is always valid. The Warning Limit (WL) dose from the control chart is 68.75 Gy, 63.99 Gy, and the Action Limit (AL) is 69.94 Gy and 62.80 Gy. The dose radiation monitoring may use the dose value equation controlled by a control chart from the permanent detector. Continuous reports on the dose value and the limit dose value are essential to ensure the health of the RSFD prototype.

Keywords


Radiography; x-ray machine; dose radiation; radiation protection; x-ray detector.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, no. GSR Part 3. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014.

Compliance Tests in X-Ray Radiology Diagnostic and Intervention. Jakarta: Chairman BAPETEN Regulation No 2, 2018.

E. Vano et al., “Dosimetric Quantities and Effective Dose in Medical Imaging: a Summary for Medical Doctors,” Insights Imaging, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 99, Jul. 2021.

I. B. G. P. Pratama, “Review on The Use of Low Energy X-ray Equipment in Diagnostic Radiology, Case Study: X-ray with Detector System Using FDR Nano Technology,” AIP Conf. Proc., no. 2374–020019, 2021.

C. Malamateniou, K. M. Knapp, M. Pergola, N. Woznitza, and M. Hardy, “Artificial Intelligence in Radiography: Where Are We Now and What Does The Future Hold?,” Radiography, 2021.

E. Babikir, A. Al-Mallah, M. Al-Sehlawi, N. Tamam, and A. Sulieman, “Patient Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Plain Radiography: An Assessment of Three Common Procedures in Ten Hospitals,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 173, p. 108888, 2020.

T. Kartika and I. B. G. P. Pratama, “Review of Medical Exposure Dose in Indonesia Based on General Radiography Technology,” AIP Conf. Proc., no. 2374–020024, 2021.

R. Fardela, G. B. Suparta, A. Ashari, and K. Triyana, “Radiation Dose Rate Measurement for Protection Program in The Work Environment for The Health Workers: An Experimental Study,” Period. Tche Quim., vol. 17, pp. 662–673, Dec. 2020.

R. Fardela, G. B. Suparta, A. Ashari, and K. Triyana, “Experimental Characterization of Dosimeter Based on a Wireless Sensor Network for A Radiation Protection Program,” IJASEIT, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021.

J. L. DH.Hong, HS.Kim, SH.Kim, “Analysis of Dose Distribution of Detectors by type of Heel Effect,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., no. ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-3C., 2019.

K. L. Lee, D. Butler, and T. Bailey, “Establishing IAEA TRS-457 Diagnostic X-ray Beam Qualities at The Australian Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 881–893, 2017.

Z. Arifin and E. Hidayanto, “Calculation Application of Patient’s Dose on Fluoroscopy X-ray Machine,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1217, no. 1, p. 12024.

S. E. Thom, “Does Advanced Practice in Radiography Benefit The Healthcare System? A Literature Review.,” Radiogr. (London, Engl. 1995), vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 84–89, Feb. 2018.

A. A. Oglat, “Acceptance Experimentation and Quality Monitor of X-ray Radiography Units,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 172, p. 108810, 2020.

R. C. Quinino, F. R. B. Cruz, and V. B. Quinino, “Control Chart for Process Mean Monitoring Combining Variable and Attribute Inspections,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 152, p. 106996, 2021.

T. E. Reeves, W. Lien, and P. Mah, “Quality assurance: Acceptance Testing for Digital Dental Intraoral Sensors,” Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol., vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 388–400, 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development